| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		Kanga
 
 
  Joined: 27 Oct 05 Posts: 1503
  Location: Moe, Victoria, Australia
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:31 pm    Post subject: Bug in tournament game | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				http://www.spielbyweb.com/game.php?games_id=33838
 
 
On the last action, Dobinator built a canal in spot 29, costing him 7 gold.  He didn't have 7 gold - and reports that he had no intention of building there anyway, was just trying to see if it would work.  It, as he points out, is not even close to his best move.
 
 
And of course just be make it more annoying, the move changes the result of the game.
 
 
So, is it possible for admin to reset the last move? | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Dobinator
 
 
  Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 383
  Location: North Carolina, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:13 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| What Kanga says is true - see the messages on the game for a recap of my stupidity. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Gaditus
 
  
  Joined: 05 Feb 07 Posts: 1924
  Location: Canterbury, UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:30 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Presumably as it is turn 11 it is not impossible to work out what the score would have been had had a legal move been made?  (Probably best to do so before the final 'desertification' kicks in).
 
 
Then it is up to the organiser to decide how to go from there. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Payton3434
 
 
  Joined: 28 Dec 06 Posts: 690
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:35 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I would say if its possible to figure out what the score would have been if the turn would have been done legally, I can take the scores down for the tournament | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Payton3434
 
 
  Joined: 28 Dec 06 Posts: 690
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:58 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| looking at the score as it is now, If he takes Kanga bribe he wins and Gishe gets 2nd, if he takes either of the other 2 bribes Gishe will win with Kanga getting 2nd | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Kanga
 
 
  Joined: 27 Oct 05 Posts: 1503
  Location: Moe, Victoria, Australia
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:59 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				It's a contentious area, adjusting scores (although less so in the case of a bug).
 
 
Santiago leads itself to serious kingmaking options.  Dobinator in this game in effect chooses who wins (he finishes in a better position if he takes my bribe and lets me win, but there's nothing stopping him taking the other bribes if for some reason he doesn't want me to win).
 
 
But at least the bribes in this game are legitimate offers.  Any player can offer an "illegitimate" - for want of a better word - bribe in the last round changing the result.  Of course it's unethical to do so in normal circumstances, but in tournament play its quite possible to actually care who finishes ahead of you, as it may affect your final ranking.  Are we obliged to play the games as individual games, or is it acceptable to take into account the current standings? | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Kanga
 
 
  Joined: 27 Oct 05 Posts: 1503
  Location: Moe, Victoria, Australia
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:01 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				For what it's worth, I think we should be encouaraged / obliged (not quite sure how) to play the games individually, otherwise it opens up a HUGE can of worms.  For example, I could stall on the last round in all my games so that I can see how other games finish before deciding who I try to make win / lose.  
 
 
Or, you might have the scenario where 2 or 3 players are all trying to make different players win to suit themselves.
 
 
Either way, it makes a mockery of playing a 9 or 11 round game to have it all decided on a whim.
 
 
It's my pet hate about Santiago, espeically online.  Face to face, we simply wouldn't allow it. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Payton3434
 
 
  Joined: 28 Dec 06 Posts: 690
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:07 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I Agree, the best decision for him is to take your bribe so that he finishes in 3rd instead of 4th, This is the only way he can better his position in the tourney!! | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Dobinator
 
 
  Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 383
  Location: North Carolina, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:43 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Here's how I think the game should come out...
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
                Green   Gray    Black   White
 
              Dobinator Kanga   gische  Mercutio
 
Beans A1*       3x5=15  4x5=20
 
Peppers D1                              2x1=2
 
Beans E1                2x1=2
 
Potatoes C2     2x6=12  3x6=18  7x6=42
 
Bananas E2      2x1=1
 
Peppers F2              2x1=2
 
Beans G2        2x1=1
 
Bananas H2              2x4=8           5x4=20
 
Cane D4         2x4=8                   3x4=12
 
Peppers B5**    
 
Cane C5***                      2x2=4   1x2=2
 
Bananas G5                      2x1=2   
 
Cane H5         2x1=2   
 
Potatoes C6     3x1=3   
 
Peppers E6      1*2=2                   2*2=2
 
Cane G6****
 
Crops              42      52      48      38
 
Cash               10      12      13      9
 
Total              52      64      61      47
 
 | 	  
 
*assumes Dobinator takes 6 bribe to place canal at spot 21 rather than paying 4
 
**assumes B5 loses one token to go to neutral
 
***assumes gische plays extra canal at spot 9 and C6 loses one token
 
****assumes G6 loses a token to go neutral
 
 
With regard to the kingmaking thing - I would have acted to better my own placement without regard to which of my opponents won.  I don't know either Kanga or gische, but I would not play favorites regardless.  I don't have any idea how this game would affect my feeble position in the overall tournament standings, and I would never do that kind of meta-gaming anyway.
 
 
I screwed up, and the above is how I think it should have been.  My apologies to all affected. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Kanga
 
 
  Joined: 27 Oct 05 Posts: 1503
  Location: Moe, Victoria, Australia
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 11:47 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I wasn't suggesting that Dobinator might be interested in kingmaking, but more that he has the option of doing so.
 
 
If you've added up the scores correctly Dobinator then I could have offered more.  I added them up so that with a bribe of 6, it would let me win by 1 gold.  I obviously chose 6 to make it as likely as I could you would choose that field.  Earlier in the game I'd have settled for 4 as you gain a lot from it too. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Payton3434
 
 
  Joined: 28 Dec 06 Posts: 690
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:41 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Green          Gray    Black   White
 
                  Dobinator    Kanga   gische  Mercutio
 
Beans A1*  3x5=15    4x5=20
 
Peppers D1                                               2x1=2
 
Beans E1                    2x1=2
 
Potatoes C2 2x7=14   3x7=21    7x7=49
 
Bananas E2   2x1=2
 
Peppers F2                  2x1=2
 
Beans G2     2x1=2
 
Bananas H2                2x4=8                     5x4=20
 
Cane D4         2x4=8                                 3x4=12
 
Peppers B5**   
 
Cane C5***               2x2=4       1x2=2
 
Bananas G5                                2x1=2   
 
Cane H5         2x1=2   
 
Potatoes C6    3x1=3   
 
Peppers E6     1*2=2                   
 
Cane G6****
 
Crops                     44         55        53               36
 
Cash                      10         12       13                 9
 
Total                      54          67       66                47
 
 
 
 
I checked the math and Dobinator had a few 2*1=1 - The Potatoes had 7 crops not 6 and e6 would go neutral
 
 
Kanga, Gishe, Dobinator, Mercuito
 
 
Please check this, if everyone agrees that will be the final standings in this game!
 
 
thank you 
 
 
Jeff | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Dobinator
 
 
  Joined: 18 Jul 07 Posts: 383
  Location: North Carolina, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:56 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| Looks good to me.  Sorry again for the trouble. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Kanga
 
 
  Joined: 27 Oct 05 Posts: 1503
  Location: Moe, Victoria, Australia
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 3:02 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| That's what I got. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		gische
 
 
  Joined: 12 Oct 05 Posts: 186
  Location: San Carlos, CA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 3:16 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I am too lazy to redo the math, so I will accept that.  Nice game. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Payton3434
 
 
  Joined: 28 Dec 06 Posts: 690
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 3:20 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				ok, I will put that result for the tournament, you might as well finish it now
 
 
 
thank you
 
 
Jeff | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |